#Bibleworks vs logos software
Related: Mark Ward shares nine initial impressions of BW 9. Bibleworks 8 toolbar decrease mouse click, save my time more easily for daily study: Logos4 is luxurious, take up a little time for daily study, need much more time learn software and not study: I like logos 3 and bibleworks 8 simple and easy for my study. If you don’t own BW or if you still have an older version, you won’t regret getting BW 9. On the other hand, Accor- dance and Bibleworks maintain sharper focus upon analysis of. On one hand, Logos has distinguished itself as a digital library platform par excellence. These include high-quality images of searchable and morphologically tagged manuscripts like Sinaiticus and Vaticanus and the NT Critical Apparatus from Dan Wallace’s Center for NT Textual Studies. Among software packages tailored to the needs of biblical scholars, Logos, Accordance, and Bibleworks together constitute a triad of indispensable research tools. (BW also includes some previous editions if you owned them in previous versions of BW: e.g., the 1984 NIV, 2005 TNIV, and 2011 NIV both the 20 HCSB both the 19 NASB.) These include the CEB (which just released) and updates of the NIV, NET, HCSB, NLT, and NAB. (It doesn’t offer an extensive library like Logos, and the books it does offer are primarily lexical and grammatical in nature.) Its strengths include its layout, speed, and value.Įarlier this week I upgraded from BW 7 to BW 9, and I’m loving it.Ī lot is new in BW 9. I have been using it almost daily since 1999, so I’m comfortable with its layout and features.īW and Logos complement more than they compete with each other. It’s no secret that I love Logos Bible Software.īut I also love BibleWorks (BW).
0 kommentar(er)
